Rating: 4.41 |
(Hint: Use number keys to rate)
(Hint: Use number keys to rate)
29.03.2011 - 16:00:36 <anon> potatoe
29.03.2011 - 16:01:12 <anon> asd
29.03.2011 - 16:01:27 <anon> Zero because only one child is girl.
29.03.2011 - 16:02:05 <anon> 50/50
29.03.2011 - 16:02:17 <anon> 50%
29.03.2011 - 16:02:20 <anon> ^ i'm american
29.03.2011 - 16:04:20 <anon> It's not 50/50 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_ratio ;)
29.03.2011 - 16:06:23 <anon> En ymmärrä, prefer finnish!
29.03.2011 - 16:06:46 <anon> 1/3
29.03.2011 - 16:06:47 <anon> male male, female female, male female => 33,(3)%
29.03.2011 - 16:09:16 <anon> told ya
29.03.2011 - 16:19:52 <anon> it really depends what the asker means
29.03.2011 - 16:21:36 <anon> I WAZ NOT AN RTARD xDDD
29.03.2011 - 16:26:39 <anon> I'm retarded American and I like fishsticks
29.03.2011 - 16:27:15 <anon> 0,25
29.03.2011 - 16:27:53 <anon> 40/60
29.03.2011 - 16:29:53 <anon> 96/4
29.03.2011 - 16:30:54 <anon> it is impossible?
29.03.2011 - 16:33:18 <anon> 0%
29.03.2011 - 16:34:42 <anon> 50/60
29.03.2011 - 16:34:57 <anon> fiftisiksti
29.03.2011 - 16:36:23 <anon> Meitsi sata prossaa satsaa...
29.03.2011 - 16:37:19 <anon> over 9000
29.03.2011 - 16:40:43 <anon> yksi lapsista on tyttö -> toinen on poika. -> 0%
29.03.2011 - 16:42:07 <anon> I am retarded Finnerican
29.03.2011 - 16:43:35 <anon> It's not 33,3% 'coz the other child is a female, therefore male/male pair is out of the question.
29.03.2011 - 16:46:30 <anon> 0,6959599 + 778 *4
29.03.2011 - 16:54:06 <anon> tricky questions, no matter what you answer, the faggot who asked you will tell you that you are wrong
29.03.2011 - 16:54:11 <anon> 51/49
29.03.2011 - 16:55:52 <anon> what if she has a gene that makes mostly girls. Then the chance would be >50% for a girl
29.03.2011 - 16:56:10 <anon> Lets assume that US has 300mil people with 50% males and 50%females. If we take two females out (mother and first child), the probability that the second child is a girl remains almost the same: 50%
29.03.2011 - 16:56:28 <anon> OHMYGOD yoU DIVIDED BY ZEROOoOO :||
29.03.2011 - 16:56:52 <anon> How about you eat some aids jizz and die? Thanks.
29.03.2011 - 16:58:24 <anon> 50/60
29.03.2011 - 17:04:17 <anon> <anon> male male, female female, male female => 33,(3)% <--incorrect, there is no dependancy, and we already know one of the children is female so male/male is impossible, as others have pointed out as well.
29.03.2011 - 17:09:16 <anon> 2 lasta joista 1 on tyttö. Vaan yks eli sen toisen täytyy olla poika. Joten 0% todennäköisyydellä se toinenki ois tyttö.
29.03.2011 - 17:10:09 <anon> 50%. Ei sen siskon sukupuoli vaikuta todennäköisyyteen. Poika tai tyttö, 50/50.
29.03.2011 - 17:16:47 <anon> mä en ole mikään vitun jenkki ja todistukseni on tämä.
29.03.2011 - 17:19:26 <anon> luonnollinen kieli on epäselvä täs mut silti kun näitä vastauksia kattoo niin tuntuu et suomalaisetki on aika retardeja
29.03.2011 - 17:21:00 <anon> If sex ratio must be 50% and there is only 2 people involved in this calculation, odds has to be 0%.. but if we count all the people in the world, odds are 50%
29.03.2011 - 17:21:09 <anon> vitut oo kato peiliin
29.03.2011 - 17:23:35 <anon> Toisen lapsen kohdalla voi olla 48% chänssit että se on toista sukupuolta sekä 2% että interseksuaali. Ei se tilastojakauma NCR mene käytännössä kuitenkaan, jokaisen lapsen kohdalla alkaa nollasta todennäköisyydet. Ihan kuin lotossakin, saman rivin toistuminen on täysin mahdollista ilman mitään todennäköisyyksiä, koska sellaisten asettaminen on mahdotonta tilanteessa, jossa lottokone toistaa alusta asti koko arvonnan jokaisella yrittämällä.
29.03.2011 - 17:24:20 <anon> 1/2 * 1/2 *100 = 25%
29.03.2011 - 17:30:29 <anon> heads or tails? Tails are girls.. now flip again, what are the changes another tails..
29.03.2011 - 17:31:04 <anon> fihty sixty.
29.03.2011 - 17:51:51 <anon> Im not a retarded american cause Im not american
29.03.2011 - 17:52:59 <anon> it's not 50%, since the birthrate of girls worldwide is actually slightly higher than that
29.03.2011 - 17:56:44 <anon> four possible combinations if we disregard intersexuals and shit like that: {BB, BG, GB, GG}, one of them is a girl so: {BG, GB, GG}, only one these has two girls: {GG}. -> 1/3
29.03.2011 - 17:57:12 <anon> first letter is the older, last letter the younger
29.03.2011 - 17:58:25 <anon> and if we would know the girl is the older/younger, the chances for the other one of being a girl is 1/2
29.03.2011 - 18:01:01 <anon> 29.03.2011 - 16:40:43 <anon> yksi lapsista on tyttö -> toinen on poika. -> 0% <- tämä
29.03.2011 - 18:07:04 <anon> who cares
29.03.2011 - 18:07:43 <anon> <anon> 29.03.2011 - 16:40:43 <anon> yksi lapsista on tyttö -> toinen on poika. -> 0% <- tämä <-- eli jos saat ensimmäiseks lapseks tytön, et IKINÄ voi saada toiseksi lapseksi poikaa? idiootit
29.03.2011 - 18:13:57 <anon> Slightly less than 50% due to the higher rate a males born to females. this difference is speculated to compensate for the higher male fatality rate due to males tendency to take more risks than females.
29.03.2011 - 18:21:22 <anon> The correct answer is 1/3, although I don't think that not understanding bayesian probability makes anybody a retard. Most of my finnish countrymen also get this wrong.
29.03.2011 - 18:22:31 <anon> 0 %, cause only ONE CHILD is a girl, the other one is a boy ;) or twitter
29.03.2011 - 18:37:09 <anon> Little less than 50%. First of all, the other birth does not affect to the gender of the other, like flipping a coin. There might be 50 tails and next one is still 50/50 chance of tails and heads respectively. Secondly, male is little more probable to born due the lightweight of the sperm which includes y-chromosome. I rest my case.
29.03.2011 - 19:01:44 <anon> male male, female female, male female, female male => 50% and suck my dick
29.03.2011 - 19:03:27 <anon> THE PROBABILITY IS ALWAYS EQUAL YOU FUCKHEADS!!!
29.03.2011 - 19:40:23 <anon> 29.03.2011 - 17:24:20 <anon> 1/2 * 1/2 *100 = 25% <----- niin, eiköhän kuitenkin tuo enimmäinen tyttö ole jo 100% varma... on hieman eri asia kysyä millä tod. saa 2 tyttöä, kuin että millä tod. saa yhden tytön lisää......... kaiken lisäksi tytön/pojan saaminen ei varmasti mene todennäköisyydellä 50%
29.03.2011 - 19:50:38 <anon> This is the most retarded thread I have ever read.
29.03.2011 - 20:15:22 <anon> 4 possibilities (M/M, F/M, M/F, F/F), of which only M/M is excluded. The other 3 are equally probable, so the answer is 1/3.
29.03.2011 - 20:18:12 <anon> samanlainen kysymys kuin jos sulla on kaksi lottopalloa ja niissä kaksi mahdollista numeroa molemmissa, eli 50%
29.03.2011 - 20:38:04 <anon> kiva tietää näin kolmelta aamuyöstä
29.03.2011 - 20:38:20 <anon> 1/74
29.03.2011 - 21:03:13 <anon> ahahahhahaha
29.03.2011 - 21:04:00 <anon> 4 possibilities (M/M, F/M, M/F, F/F), of which only M/M is excluded. The other 3 are equally probable, so the answer is 1/3. <- M/F and F/M are the same thing, or you can exclude M/F because the first one was not male. Either way it's either F/M or F/F. You do the math.
29.03.2011 - 21:06:08 <anon> ei vittu eikö ne oikeesti tajua että se on 0% :D
29.03.2011 - 21:20:25 <anon> u'll have to take Mendel's law into account
29.03.2011 - 21:45:01 <anon> but what if penis is hidden?
29.03.2011 - 21:53:42 <anon> vitun retardit, se on ~50% koska sen tokan lapsen sukupuoli ei riipu ensimmäisestä.
29.03.2011 - 21:59:01 <anon> Assuming a priori probability of 50% for a child to be a girl, if we want to calculate what is the probability of two random children both being girls, the probability is 0.5 * 0.5 = 0.25. If we already know that one of the children is a girl, then the independent probability of the second child being a girl is 50%.
29.03.2011 - 23:04:13 <anon> naisella on kaksi lasta toinen on tyttö. tämän tiedon valossa väittäisin et mahdollisuudet sen pojan olla tyttö on aika helvetin pienet
29.03.2011 - 23:04:53 <anon> woman has 2 children that other one is girl so the other one cant fucking be a girl
29.03.2011 - 23:12:21 <anon> 95% of the world can't answer this question considering there are still large populations who are very illiterate and therefore probably can't even do math. But hey, I'm with you, I hate Americans too. I just don't need to hide that hate behind a stupid fucking question. I can say it out loud. "FUCKING AMERICANS ARE RETARDED."
29.03.2011 - 23:17:49 <anon> There is no chance that the other child is also female because there is no other child.
29.03.2011 - 23:18:25 <anon> ..I've taken already care of him/her. XD
29.03.2011 - 23:52:55 <anon> KAKS LASTA JA YKS ON ÄMMÄ MONTAKO ON ÄMMII xDDDD TAJUSIN HERPADERPA
30.03.2011 - 00:55:09 <anon> 4 out of 3 Americans agree this post is shit!
30.03.2011 - 01:54:40 <anon> 29.03.2011 - 16:26:39 <anon> I'm retarded American and I like fishsticks <-- so you like putting fishsticks in your mouth.. so, what are you? A GAY FISH brahahahahhahahah
30.03.2011 - 03:30:38 <anon> 33,3% (it's one in three: boy girl, girl boy, girl girl)
30.03.2011 - 03:43:32 <anon> woman has 2 children that other one is girl so the other one cant fucking be a girl
30.03.2011 - 03:43:34 <anon> naisella on kaksi lasta toinen on tyttö. tämän tiedon valossa väittäisin et mahdollisuudet sen pojan olla tyttö on aika helvetin pienet
30.03.2011 - 03:43:40 <anon> vitun luuseri
30.03.2011 - 03:53:24 <anon> 1 in 4
30.03.2011 - 03:53:38 <anon> and 1 in 2
30.03.2011 - 04:18:31 <anon> this too is a counter-intuitive math problem: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monty_Hall_problem
30.03.2011 - 05:25:59 <anon> The statement "1 child is a girl" does not necessarily imply that the other child is NOT a girl. But ok.
30.03.2011 - 06:09:36 <anon> 0% i aborted the other.
30.03.2011 - 07:24:48 <anon> who gives a fuck
30.03.2011 - 08:43:16 <anon> Jos kysymys kuuluisi, millä todennäköisyydellä lapset ovat kummatkin tyttöjä (TAI poikia, tai tyttö ja poika), vastaus olisi 33%. Tässä yksi mahdollisuuksista on jo poissuljettu, joten vastaus on 25%.
30.03.2011 - 09:21:47 <anon> Odss of bitch = 100%
30.03.2011 - 09:54:58 <anon> 0% assholes. two kids, 1 girl -->> other one is boy
30.03.2011 - 10:02:40 <anon> 2/3 is correct
30.03.2011 - 10:21:48 <anon> You niggers are all posting in a troll thread.
30.03.2011 - 12:22:48 <anon> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boy_or_Girl_paradox
30.03.2011 - 12:43:28 <anon> 1/4
30.03.2011 - 12:58:31 <anon> Tuossahan se selkeästi sanotaan: Lapsista 1 on tyttö. Siis se toinen on tyttö. Ei siis molemmat. Toinen on tällöin poika.
30.03.2011 - 13:35:45 <anon> 12:58:31 <anon> Tuossahan se selkeästi sanotaan: Lapsista 1 on tyttö. Siis se toinen on tyttö. Ei siis molemmat. Toinen on tällöin poika. |||| Käys opettelemassa hieman englantia ensin.. vaikka tämä kysymys on päin vittua kirjoitettu siinä tarkoitetaan "mitkä ovat mahdollisuudet että myös toinen on tyttö" Joka on ainut kysymys mihin halutaan vastaus ja loput on vain infoa huonolla englannilla joka pitää koittaa ymmärtää.
30.03.2011 - 15:53:16 <anon> the other one is your fucking mom
30.03.2011 - 17:45:07 <anon> "M/F and F/M are the same thing" <- Lies. They're 2 different scenarios: The firstborn is male and second female or vice versa.
30.03.2011 - 23:09:22 <anon> 0% IRL, THAIMAASSA 50% JA APINASSA 75%
31.03.2011 - 00:10:13 <anon> ootte kyllä ihan vitun tyhmi' paskoja.
31.03.2011 - 01:02:02 <anon> se on fifti-sixti
31.03.2011 - 02:20:38 <anon> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boy_or_Girl_paradox - go there, and stop making yourselves even more stupid-looking xD -- The answer is EITHER 1/3 or 1/2, it depends. Read the Wiki-article, if you really wanna know what's this all about.
01.04.2011 - 03:41:20 <anon> i m special
06.04.2011 - 10:48:10 <anon> everyone who said 1/3 should be shot. the genders of the children are independent. given one is a girl, theres a 50 percent chance that the other is also a girl. fuck.
12.04.2011 - 22:53:38 <anon> 100% of people who make images like this are retarded. No debate needed.
23.04.2011 - 22:58:05 <anon> I am not American - there is your proof. Only retards would try to find Americans from abina.biz
23.05.2011 - 10:46:28 <anon> 1ist girl 50%, 2nd girl another 50% -> ((1/5)^2 - 1)
13.06.2011 - 09:06:18 <anon> 50/50 m/l
15.06.2011 - 03:25:33 <anon> <anon> everyone who said 1/3 should be shot. the genders of the children are independent. given one is a girl, theres a 50 percent chance that the other is also a girl. fuck. <- You sir are an idiot. But hey, this is mathematics (yes, not biology), its not ment for idiots.
15.06.2011 - 18:40:34 <anon> It's the same probability that it's a boy - fuckwits
10.08.2011 - 01:59:19 <anon> 1/2*1/2 (combination), but 1/2 for the next. choose (i'm not an americunt)
22.08.2011 - 13:14:23 <anon> :D comments are the funny part as usual..
22.08.2011 - 13:15:07 <anon> Well atleast im just a retard and not American retard...
14.11.2011 - 10:55:12 <anon> succesful trolling
30.12.2011 - 21:05:49 <anon> 140%
29.01.2012 - 01:25:11 <anon> PENIS
29.01.2012 - 01:25:17 <anon> It's a trap!
20.02.2012 - 03:30:30 <anon> Zero because only one child is girl. <- this
01.03.2012 - 14:55:33 <anon> Americans are the best. We own the rest of the world in everything. We probably even made this question and you could not solve it =/ ... but that's okay. We forgive you with our superior grace ;)
20.03.2012 - 17:09:43 <anon> monesta laskusta unohtunu neliäjuuri
12.04.2012 - 18:32:26 <anon> jaa vitustako minä tiedän, en kauheesti tunne biologiaa
27.05.2012 - 09:52:12 <anon> what is a female?
01.08.2012 - 05:32:12 <anon> well it really depends on if you pinch off your girl-sperm nut when you come
01.08.2012 - 21:10:02 <anon> wtf people! if 1 of 2 is a girl, the second one MUST be a boy. so 0%
07.08.2012 - 22:16:18 <anon> 0% retards because womans cannot get childs on their own.
14.08.2012 - 16:58:40 <anon> im finn
19.08.2012 - 12:21:06 <anon> 88% of percents are made up on the spot
21.09.2012 - 17:35:09 <anon> Nookyeller boom yer post is ear elephunt.
24.02.2013 - 23:29:33 <anon> 25% it can be a. a boy. b. a girl. c. hermaphrodite. d. born without genitalia
02.04.2013 - 23:06:13 <anon> inadequate information presented, provide genetic samples of the male gene donor, please.
19.04.2013 - 17:52:30 <anon> if there's 2 children, of which 1 is a girl.. then other is a boy with 100% probability
28.08.2013 - 18:20:39 <anon> c'mon ppl. if only one is a girl then what the hell could the other one be
12.05.2014 - 13:40:00 <anon> 0% you fucking dumbshits
06.06.2014 - 00:02:36 <anon> kysyjä taitaa olla idiootti, vastaus ei ole 50/50. joku sähkö tulee seinärasiasta yksinkertaistaja
26.06.2014 - 00:01:29 <anon> I just wish they would stop the jests in terminology. And learn to make coherent sentences.
10.12.2014 - 04:23:34 <anon> Who ever made this bad example is retardet.
28.07.2015 - 00:06:44 <anon> Meh. It doesn't say "ONLY 1 child is a girl". So the known child doesn't matter.
19.08.2016 - 03:15:42 <anon> 666%
23.08.2016 - 18:19:03 <anon> In these kind of squertions, answear is in the wind. 105% is my final offer. Wai mitä?
15.12.2016 - 18:12:12 <anon> It's 50-50. It's always 50-50, like tossing a coin. If you're asking what are the odds for having 2 girls instead, answer would be different.
01.02.2017 - 14:23:36 <anon> 1/3
30.12.2017 - 23:01:54 <anon> Most comments ever on apina?
22.07.2020 - 23:25:10 <anon> Tuossa tilanteessa miettisin tovin kysymystä, päättäisin lopulta jättää vastaamatta ja NUSSISIN kysyjää.
28.02.2022 - 05:23:19 <anon> This is really dumb, it doesn't say "only one child is a girl." Learn English, you filthy foreigner.
23.07.2022 - 23:43:51 <anon> You should swallow and not creampie and you wouldn't have these retarded questions
02.03.2023 - 20:59:39 <anon> with all these gender shit nowadays, changes are between 0 and 100%
08.11.2025 - 16:11:56 <anon> Stop jerk off. I know a site where thousands of single girls are waiting to be fucked. Look at them: https://ja.cat/apn
27.11.2025 - 20:16:29 <anon> Quick sex with hot girls, come on in(click>>) https://ja.cat/finn ❤️
28.11.2025 - 10:15:49 <anon> Stop jerk off. I know a site where thousands of single girls are waiting to be fucked. Look at them: https://ja.cat/NU17
28.11.2025 - 20:03:01 <anon> ❤️ SEXCHAT with single girls > https://ja.cat/APINA