Rating: 4.54 |
(Hint: Use number keys to rate)
(Hint: Use number keys to rate)
06.02.2015 - 22:16:44 <anon> tänään saa juoda kaljan
06.02.2015 - 22:27:36 <anon> Hahahhahahahahah so small butt plug! so small! pataässämies will laugh his ass off if he sees this small gay plug.
06.02.2015 - 22:27:58 <anon> ^ Sorry that was from the memory of my browser, I'm too lazy to invent a new comment.
06.02.2015 - 22:29:15 <anon> Googled my original comment, here: http://apina.biz/126672
06.02.2015 - 22:36:51 <anon> Jet fuel doesn't need to melt steel beams, it just needs to soften them by a fraction and the whole tower comes crashing down. Oh wait, it did.
06.02.2015 - 23:22:49 <anon> Jännää illuminaattijutskaa
07.02.2015 - 00:15:33 <anon> tässä pitää tietää 911. WTC oli sunniteltu kestämään lentokoneen törmäyksen, mutta ei tulipaloa ja törmäystä. teräksen kimmomoduuli laskee huomattavasti lämpötilan funktiona
07.02.2015 - 00:26:35 <anon> 06.02.2015 - 22:36:51 <anon> Jet fuel doesn't need to melt steel beams...<-Got any proof on that, mate? So upper level fires softened the complete structure of WTC making it crumble down in free fall speed? How about building 7? Was it softened too by radiating heat from twin towers? Maybe you want to cut down on your daily cnn dosage a little bit.
07.02.2015 - 00:33:53 <anon> ^ Idiot. Dynamic fucking loading.
07.02.2015 - 00:40:12 <anon> And Yeah, steel loses 30% strength by 430 C
07.02.2015 - 00:40:29 <anon> 07.02.2015 - 00:33:53 <anon> ^ Idiot. Dynamic fucking loading.<-How nice of you to start with insult and then continue with a fancy word but not adding anything factual. Floors of skyscrapers are not train carts but they are fixed into main frame. Each floor would absorb energy while collapsing causing reduced speed compared what is documented. Again, how about building 7?
07.02.2015 - 00:41:19 <anon> And it only has 40% of its initial strength left at 540 C
07.02.2015 - 00:46:20 <anon> The floors absorbing energy? Did you count frames and get exactly 9.81m/s^2 acceleration for the whole collapse? I wouldn't be surprised if it was very close.
07.02.2015 - 01:03:22 <anon> 07.02.2015 - 00:46:20 <anon> The floors absorbing...<-Not sure what you are trying to say. It was very close and that's the whole point. Did fire soften the complete building(s) or was there some other cause for floors not resisting in any mentionable way?
07.02.2015 - 01:15:17 <anon> You're the one claiming extraordinary circumstances. You're the one who needs to provide extraordinary evidence. The collapse had a huge amount of mass driving the failure of each successive floor. I see no way for it to slow down in any perceptible way.
07.02.2015 - 01:26:34 <anon> 07.02.2015 - 01:15:17 <anon> You're the one claiming...<-Please, I think it is quite extraordinary to claim fire taking down a skyscraper. It has happened twice, on 9/11. Wikipedia may talk about dynamic forces vs. static loads but forgot Newton´s laws neatly. If object is on a free fall it can not be pushing anything before it.
07.02.2015 - 01:34:36 <anon> Fire, and a lot of damage before that fire. 767 jets hitting skyscrapers is extraordinary indeed. Or are you denying that as well?
07.02.2015 - 01:35:19 <anon> "We were up on the upper floors of the Verizon building looking at it. You could just see the whole bottom corner of the building was gone." Lookting at WTC 7. The building was heavily damaged. Easy to ignore on a conspiracy binge.
07.02.2015 - 01:36:33 <anon> Easy answer to WTC 7. ALIENS!
07.02.2015 - 01:38:52 <anon> http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm <- Go read that about WTC 7
07.02.2015 - 01:42:58 <anon> It may very well be that you have made your mind about what to believe. Taking random quotes is a good way to strenghten your belief. You have unalianable right to do so. What I am doing is asking questions, not claiming to be absolutely right.
07.02.2015 - 01:45:20 <anon> If you are interested in asking questions instead of relying on faith, you may give some alternative for mainstream a change. http://www.serendipity.li/wot/pop_mech/reply_to_popular_mechanics.htm#6
07.02.2015 - 02:00:52 <anon> Faith? That's quite the miss there. I am quite diametrically opposed to faith. You are asking questions but ignoring the answers. You must watch a lot of FOX news.
07.02.2015 - 02:01:12 <anon> ^On there you can find replies to most of the claims presented also on your "debunking" link. Getting both sides of story is a nice way to avoid confirmation bias.
07.02.2015 - 02:05:49 <anon> Full of answers ignoring physical properties of matter.
07.02.2015 - 02:08:43 <anon> 07.02.2015 - 02:00:52 <anon> Faith? That's quite the miss there....<-I got an impression of not getting anywhere. Be honest, you would not accept anything else but jet fuel theory even if I had a time machine. FOX is mainstream, it will back you up anytime, not me. Again, I have read your link previously and it brings nothing but hear-say on the table.
07.02.2015 - 02:11:54 <anon> I'm quite open to facts and data, you provide neither.
07.02.2015 - 02:16:17 <anon> ^You like to repeat that. So you just ingnored my link?
07.02.2015 - 02:17:13 <anon> Vittu ne weeteeceet tuli sellasta kyytiä alas että jos täällä on ihmisiä jotka uskoo että ne koneet tuhos ne nii olen pettynyt kyllä , uskoni apinan käyttäjiin alkaa hiipua
07.02.2015 - 02:21:39 <anon> I'm reading your link. It makes more questions and tries to muddy the waters further. When it tries to claim something factual it fails.
07.02.2015 - 02:22:07 <anon> Some more alternative approach: www.ae911truth.org They are not even Alex Jones fans but actual professionals.
07.02.2015 - 02:41:49 <anon> Trade centre facts are irrelevant. NO PLANE HIT THE PENTAGON. Therefore its safe to say that everything else on that day was pre-planned. AKA - planned demolition of WTC 1, 2 and 7
07.02.2015 - 03:01:41 <anon> skyscrapers have fallen without fires do to structurals weakness, have you concidered how much half a skyscraper weights on top of the burning floors?? oh you thought the top levitates !!
07.02.2015 - 03:09:46 <anon> ^^there's a fucking video showing a plane hit pentagon and how about all those people who died? they were nonpersons that were secretly entered by cia into public records of all kinds and they invented families for them? what are you retard? and then there is the 4th plane that dropped to the ground and we got all the bodies from that as evidence, wow stupids
07.02.2015 - 03:27:27 <anon> ^There is no video showing a plane crashing into pentagon. Fourth plane crash site was a pool sized hole in a ground without any bodies. I would love to see the video if there is one.
07.02.2015 - 03:34:53 <anon> 07.02.2015 - 03:01:41 <anon> skyscrapers have fallen without fires...<-Sure skyscrapers can fall from design flaws, natural disasters, explosions etc. They are not levitating like this one dude claims people to believe. That is not the issue. Issue is can they be weakened enough from short exposure from heat and damage from impact the way wtc did.
07.02.2015 - 04:04:13 <anon> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TuGWRUplhA
07.02.2015 - 04:43:42 <anon> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOb92R34jxo
07.02.2015 - 04:59:14 <anon> ^In a safe harbour of remote finnish site, spreading the word. Thank you.
07.02.2015 - 09:09:54 <anon> This thread is hilarious. I didn't know Apina had so many certified structural engineers using it.
07.02.2015 - 11:08:57 <anon> 9/11
07.02.2015 - 12:19:18 <anon> 07.02.2015 - 09:09:54 <anon> This thread is hilarious. I didn't know Apina had so many certified structural engineers using it. <--- Who is claiming to be a structural engineer? I didn't know you needed a degree to know basics of how the world works.
07.02.2015 - 12:32:13 <anon> vittu mikä argumentti
08.02.2015 - 13:34:56 <anon> 911 is the best thing ever happened to US. ;) 421 boys.
09.02.2015 - 14:23:34 <anon> Steel weakens in heat, aluminium melts in fire and molten aluminium + water will explode. There's plenty of aluminium in a plane, you know.
09.02.2015 - 23:40:14 <anon> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNZboI5Fovo
09.02.2015 - 23:44:10 <anon> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xX2dWCN1zhc
29.04.2018 - 01:38:33 <anon> sussia is not a country but inflaten cia gasstation
04.09.2018 - 19:43:38 <anon> 2018 and we still dont know what hit Pentagon. Wasnt plane thats for sure.
08.11.2025 - 17:43:52 <anon> Stop jerk off. I know a site where thousands of single girls are waiting to be fucked. Look at them: https://ja.cat/apn
27.11.2025 - 21:49:33 <anon> Quick sex with hot girls, come on in(click>>) https://ja.cat/finn ❤️
28.11.2025 - 05:47:45 <anon> ❤️ SEXCHAT with single girls > https://ja.cat/APINA
28.11.2025 - 11:46:01 <anon> Stop jerk off. I know a site where thousands of single girls are waiting to be fucked. Look at them: https://ja.cat/NU17