Rating: 3.97 |
(Hint: Use number keys to rate)
(Hint: Use number keys to rate)
04.10.2023 - 22:09:01 <anon> Myllypurossa perseet tervataan. -panomies
04.10.2023 - 22:14:49 <anon> this is stupid, "k in array" is testing whether a key exists in the array. Not whether a value exists in the array. For that you can use l.includes(4) and it returns true
04.10.2023 - 23:17:08 <anon> Apinan moderaattorit vihaavat Anssia! Kommentteja poistetaan! OIKEUTTA ANSSILLE!
05.10.2023 - 00:08:47 <anon> arrays start from 0 duh
05.10.2023 - 02:46:39 <anon> js
05.10.2023 - 11:43:47 <anon> only silly people think you would find a 4 from an array of 4
05.10.2023 - 12:57:45 <anon> 22:14:49 "arrays" in most programming languages don't have keys, but indices instead. It makes no sense to test whether an INDEX exists in an array with the nice syntactic sugar "in" operator. You would always be checking the existence of an index via the array's length.
05.10.2023 - 14:11:00 <anon> should test for "0 of l" and "4 of l", instead of in
05.10.2023 - 23:31:10 <anon> R.I.H. (Rot In Hell) Vladimir Putin (1952-2023)
05.10.2023 - 23:31:20 <anon> mitä vittua?
06.10.2023 - 10:16:48 <anon> Only in javascript do you need to test if a key exists in an array. jesus christ
06.10.2023 - 21:48:55 <anon> Täysin loogista, paskat koodarit ei vaan osaa.