Rating: 5.37 |
(Hint: Use number keys to rate)
(Hint: Use number keys to rate)
21.01.2013 - 16:22:33 <anon> super gay
21.01.2013 - 16:24:35 <anon> kommunisti rpopagandaa
21.01.2013 - 16:41:10 <anon> Well it really does. Socialists are just so stunningly stupid that they don't see how every single country on this earth wants foreign investments because those create jobs, wealth and tax incomes to that state.
21.01.2013 - 17:11:29 <anon> Illuminati all gathered
21.01.2013 - 18:28:24 <anon> Actually anon, it doesn't. The concentration of wealth is greater than ever before. No trickling to be seen.
21.01.2013 - 18:30:08 <anon> Reagan ruled your face
21.01.2013 - 18:42:39 <anon> I bet someone let one rip
21.01.2013 - 19:06:56 <anon> To "actually anon" anon. The concentration of wealth might be bigger than twenty years ago but at the same the material welfare and wealth of poor people have increased dramatically but the wealth of rich people have increased even more. That is only natural and it should be that way because in the end these rich people you socialists despise so much are the reason there are companies to work beging with and tax incomes to a state which make your precious welfare state possible.
21.01.2013 - 19:33:19 <anon> "Socialists are just so stunningly stupid that they don't see how every single country on this earth wants foreign investments because those create jobs, wealth and tax incomes to that state."<- What the fuck?
21.01.2013 - 19:40:21 <anon> sauce needed http://apina.biz/7220
21.01.2013 - 19:53:39 <anon> Rich people are good at keeping money, poor people are good at spending more than they have. Which of those two groups would recirculate the money into the economy faster? Kinda common sense.
21.01.2013 - 20:42:11 <anon> ^I understand your point and you are partially right but the rich people really those how establish and FUND new companies and invest on the bonds of states and companies, which actually create the jobs and wealth to the common people. These rich people are thus a driving force of our economy and equally important than the consumers, or the poor people you mentioned.
21.01.2013 - 21:07:47 <anon> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gini_coefficient
21.01.2013 - 22:19:17 <anon> Only thing trickling down is shit in Reagans pants
21.01.2013 - 22:49:40 <anon> Mm yes. The classic quarrel between what I like to call "ideoeconomics". It's so silly people think they understand economics so well that they can be 100% sure their vision of a working & sustainable economy is the best and the only way. It only shows how uneducated you are when you cant see social phenomenas from different perspectives.
21.01.2013 - 22:53:05 <anon> To continue; Economics is not a natural science. It is not physics, nor mathematics. Economics as a field is as prone to different "trends of truth" as any other soft science. What is knowledge or truth today, might be nonsense tomorrow. Which is why it is so important not to religiously stick with only one truth.
21.01.2013 - 23:01:19 <anon> And the classic argument of "whether or not the rich have gotten even richer, the overall wealth has still increased in all social classes" is rendered invalid by the simple fact that there is no other economic policy to compare with. We will never know what a strongly Keynesian economic policy wouldve created. I've also noticed that people who havent experienced life in an economically unequal society with the negative effects it has on EVERYONE, are more prone to stand for liberal policies.
21.01.2013 - 23:02:28 <anon> Oh well, I guess this is not the forum for this kind of debate. Yet, it kinda helps to write down these things in order to make sense of your own thoughts.
22.01.2013 - 01:02:06 <anon> ^Yes. I'm very well aware of the concept of "one truth", which you so eloquently referred while giving an impression that you are somehow above that. But in the same time you, yourself, believe to this ideology of postmodernis which state that there is no single truth, whether it is actually truth or not.
22.01.2013 - 01:10:55 <anon> In the case of economics, there are plenty of mathematical models which can predict, from the correlations of phenomena, occurrences with stunning precision. That is why I argue that people actually can find the best solution for the issues at hand by taking enough economical variables to a count. I believe that economical decisions can be in some extend ideology free even though that is rarely the case in the contemporar financial politics.
22.01.2013 - 02:47:18 <anon> Guys. This is what this site should be like. Pictures that provoke intellectual conversations and challenge people to think. It is too bad that this is rarely the case.
22.01.2013 - 05:21:50 <anon> Mitt Romney's laughing too !
22.01.2013 - 11:11:17 <anon> Lopputulos yhteiskunnallinen eriarvoistuminen joka johtaa pamaukseen kun se jatkuu tarpeeksi kauan
22.01.2013 - 13:00:46 <anon> Kukaan ei varmaan ole huomannut mitä jokaisessa uutisessa on puhuttu talouden alamäestä viimeisen vuoden ajan. Sivistäkää itseänne, ymmärtäkää mitä on tapahtumassa. On liian myöhästä mennä kauppaan ostamaan ruokaa kun käteinen raha on arvotonta.
22.01.2013 - 14:53:25 <anon> Wow. A conversation in APINA. Almost a place for a screenshot...
22.01.2013 - 19:44:35 <anon> In the case of economics, there are plenty of mathematical models which can predict, from the correlations of phenomena, occurrences with stunning precision. <- are you retarded?
22.01.2013 - 20:04:53 <anon> Trickling down already?
23.01.2013 - 17:20:52 <anon> Communists gonna comm
25.06.2013 - 18:00:35 <anon> Yeah and with Obamanomics working so well....
17.01.2014 - 12:39:13 <anon> Yeah no redistribution, but everyone became whealthier. Maybe you should talk about your jealousy to your therapist.
01.04.2014 - 23:21:35 <anon> Shit trickles, not dough.
23.02.2015 - 07:09:54 <anon> assholes wrecked the world economy
20.02.2021 - 12:10:55 <anon> hеllo, my naked video here: girl24.pro
20.02.2021 - 12:10:56 <anon> hеllo, my naked video here: girl24.pro
20.02.2021 - 12:10:57 <anon> hеllo, my naked video here: girl24.pro
20.02.2021 - 12:10:58 <anon> hеllo, my naked video here: girl24.pro
20.02.2021 - 12:10:59 <anon> hеllo, my naked video here: girl24.pro
20.02.2021 - 12:11:00 <anon> hеllo, my naked video here: girl24.pro
20.02.2021 - 12:11:02 <anon> hеllo, my naked video here: girl24.pro
20.02.2021 - 12:11:03 <anon> hеllo, my naked video here: girl24.pro
20.02.2021 - 12:11:04 <anon> hеllo, my naked video here: girl24.pro
20.02.2021 - 12:11:05 <anon> hеllo, my naked video here: girl24.pro
20.02.2021 - 12:11:05 <anon> hеllo, my naked video here: girl24.pro
20.02.2021 - 12:11:06 <anon> hеllo, my naked video here: girl24.pro
20.02.2021 - 12:11:07 <anon> hеllo, my naked video here: girl24.pro
20.02.2021 - 12:11:08 <anon> hеllo, my naked video here: girl24.pro
20.02.2021 - 12:11:09 <anon> hеllo, my naked video here: girl24.pro
20.02.2021 - 12:11:10 <anon> hеllo, my naked video here: girl24.pro
20.02.2021 - 12:11:12 <anon> hеllo, my naked video here: girl24.pro
20.02.2021 - 12:11:13 <anon> hеllo, my naked video here: girl24.pro
20.02.2021 - 12:11:13 <anon> hеllo, my naked video here: girl24.pro
20.02.2021 - 12:11:14 <anon> hеllo, my naked video here: girl24.pro
08.11.2025 - 17:08:00 <anon> Stop jerk off. I know a site where thousands of single girls are waiting to be fucked. Look at them: https://ja.cat/apn
27.11.2025 - 20:26:35 <anon> Quick sex with hot girls, come on in(click>>) https://ja.cat/finn ❤️
28.11.2025 - 03:09:52 <anon> Stop jerk off. I know a site where thousands of single girls are waiting to be fucked. Look at them: https://ja.cat/NU17
28.11.2025 - 11:58:47 <anon> ❤️ SEXCHAT with single girls > https://ja.cat/APINA